Back

Lessons from the College Football Playoff

December 14, 2023

Blogs

Login to Like 0

Early in this century, a computer algorithm would evaluate all Division I college football teams and spit out the two “most deserving” of a spot in the national championship game. After a 2011 championship game that saw Alabama and LSU play each other for the second time that season, with the game finishing with a score of 9 to 6, people grew upset with a computer deciding who played for a title.

So, in 2014, the rules were changed. And now, a committee of humans selects the four best teams, and those teams compete in a playoff for the title. This committee of athletic directors, former coaches, and prominent figures watches the games and ranks the teams (instead of using rankings based on a computer algorithm). The thinking in the rules change was that humans could make more appropriate contextualized decisions after watching college football teams with their own eyes.

After nine years of this approach, many people have been generally favorable of the committee’s work. And many people believed the committee had established fairly consistent standards of what it would take for a team to be ranked in the top four, thus having the chance to play for the national championship. However, on December 3, 2023, this sentiment toward the committee shifted when the committee broke a nine-year precedent by leaving out a team, the Florida State University Seminoles (FSU), that had not lost a single game all season.

This decision sparked debate throughout the country, and some fans were outraged that a Power 5 team was left out of the playoff when it had done everything possible to play for a title. The counterargument was that FSU had been left out due to weak strength of schedule and an injured star quarterback. While the decision of which teams make the playoff is beyond anyone’s control outside of the committee, the decision has important implications for any team wanting to reach the top of Division I college football.

The lesson that can be taken away from this decision is to always push harder when faced with adversity. If you want to be the best, whether that’s the best leader, co-worker, parent, or spouse, you must be comfortable with the uncomfortable. Had FSU shown more capability on the football field following the loss of their quarterback, they would have had the chance to play for the championship. Alabama, the team that took FSU’s spot, had to overcome an early season loss, show growth throughout the season, and beat a juggernaut in their last game just to be considered. What all of these playoff teams have in common is that they knew the goal they wanted to achieve (to make the playoff) would not be easy, and they would do whatever it took to give themselves a chance.

If you and your team want to succeed at the highest level, these are important lessons to keep in mind. Striving to push outside of your comfort zone and tackle complicated problems will prepare you to achieve success in the long term. Don’t shun the easier path; taking an easy path may be less scary at first, but buck the comfortability and push to achieve things people didn’t think were possible — the rewards reaped at the end of the journey will be worthwhile. So, consider the misfortune of FSU as a cautionary tale to all who underperform in the face of adversity. While achieving goals along an easy path may appear to be a measure of success, such achievements may not compare favorably to the success of others when “the committee” is making its decisions.

You're not logged in.

Apply now to gain exclusive leader insights and connect with top industry leaders, helping your team achieve higher levels of performance.

Continue without signing up

Search

Putting AI in Its Proper Place: Why Organizational Health Still Comes First

Opportunity: One Leader’s Example of What it Means to Seize the Initiative

Leading When the Currency of Success Is Changing

Inspiring Leadership & Pursuit of Meaningful Life

One Cut at a Time: 8 Leadership Lessons from the Barber’s Chair

Better Decisions Require Better Processes, Not Smarter Leaders

When Performance Goes Dark: Why Organizations Need Better Visibility Before AI Takes the Wheel

When Should Leaders Trust Their Gut?

Leadership in Seat 18E

Why Leaders Must Learn to Sense Before They Act

The Leader with the Mop

Organizational Design Is About Fit, Not Fashion

The Uncanny Valley

The Hidden Risk That Begins After Leaders Decide

It’s Good to be a Fan of People

An Analysis of 1,000 Meetings Shows How the Best Leaders Shape Conversations

Leaders Must…

5 Ways to Wield Influence When You Lack Authority

The Order of Honor

A Message to Garcia

Growing Fast Without Growing Apart: Why Turnover and Employee Commitment Matter More Than Ever

3 Questions to Pressure – Test Your Priorities

El Cap and Overnight Success

2026 Global Leadership Study: Research Findings

The Squirrel Union

The Two-Organizations Problem

Be All In Where You Are

Writing as a Force Multiplier

Learning Stewardship in a Culture of Urgency

The Best Leaders are Great Teachers

As Many Times as It Takes: Consistent Enforcement of Team Standards

The Best Leaders Are Great Followers